SIR TREVOR McDONALD, the black ITN newscaster, should be restricted to reading news about muggings and drug busts, according to the Hitler historian David Irving.
His words were quoted back at him in court yesterday as he faced allegations of unvarnished racism. He agreed that in a speech to the Clarendon Club, he had yearned for the old days when newsreaders wore dinner jackets on air. He had said: "For a transitional period, I'd be prepared to accept that the BBC should have a dinner-jacketed gentleman reading the important news to us, followed by a lady reading all the less important news, followed by Trevor McDonald giving us all the latest news about the muggings and the drug busts."
Mr Irving, who is suing the American academic Deborah Lipstadt for libel over a book in which she describes him as a "holocaust denier", was taken through a passage from his private diary by her counsel, Richard Rampton QC. It concerned a day when he took his baby daughter Jessica out for a walk near their home in London. According to the diary, he had been singing her a ditty beginning "My name is Baby Jessica" when "half-breed" children were wheeled past them in their prams, and he changed the words to something more "scurrilous" which began: "I am a Baby Aryan."
Mr Irving agreed that he had recorded the ditties in his diary on September 17, 1994, after returning from the walk with his "fine little lady" of a daughter. But on a day of heated exchanges with Mr Rampton, he denied a suggestion that the diary entry was one of many examples of his alleged racism. Mr Irving said that what he had written was a private response to a smear in the magazine Searchlight in which he said that his family was described as a "perfect Aryan family".
Mr Irving was obliged to hand over his diaries before the hearing as part of the normal exchange of documents.
Irving's 'Ditty'
I am a Baby Aryan
Not Jewish or Sectarian
I have no plans to marry an
Ape or Rastafarian.
THE Hitler historian David Irving was accused of "unvarnished racism" at his High Court libel trial yesterday as he was taken through his private diary, which he never thought anyone else would read.
Millions of words, both unpublished and contained in speeches he made to right-wing audiences, came under scrutiny along with damaging allegations made about how he had poisoned his daughter's mind with racism. He was also cross-examined about a book he published in which he attacked the Jews for their greed.
He agreed that in July 1997 he wrote in A Radical's Diary: "They clammer 'Ours! Ours! Ours!' when hoards of gold are uncovered. And then when anti-Semitism increases and the inevitable mindless pogroms occur, they ask with genuine surprise 'Why us?' "
In a series of heated exchanges with Richard Rampton, QC, he was taken through a series of utterances he has made about the Jews, but denied that he is a racist.
Mr Irving, 62, who said he strongly objected to the "kind of excerpting" exercise on which Mr Rampton embarked, was taken through an interview he had given to the journalist Errol Morris on November 8, 1998, in which he analysed anti-Semitism and suggested that money lay at its root. The historian, who has denied that Jews were exterminated in the concentration camp gas chambers during the Second World War, said that the Jewish community had only to be called liars for their accusers to be thrown into jail. He said: "The question which would concern me, if I was a Jew, is not who pulled the trigger, but why? Why are we disliked? Is it something we are doing?
"You people are disliked on a global scale. You have been disliked for 3,000 years and yet you never seem to ask what is at the root of this dislike . . . no sooner do you arrive as a people in a new country, then within 50 years you are already being disliked all over again.
"Now, what is it? And I don't know the answer to this. Is it built into our microchip?"
He questioned whether it could be because non-Jews did not like the way they looked or whether it was down to envy because they were more successful. "It was not just a 'nudge, nudge, wink, wink' dislike but on a 'visceral, guts-wrenching, murderous level, that no sooner do we arrive than we are being massacred, and beaten, and brutalised and imprisoned, until we have to move on somewhere else." He added: "I would say that they're a clever race. I would say that as a race they are better at making money than I am. That's a racist remark, of course. But they appear to be better at making money than I am. If I was going to be crude, I would say not only are they better at making money, but they are greedy."
Asked about such remarks by Mr Rampton, Mr Irving said: "In my own clumsy way I am trying to find out why we don't like them. It's a very coherent expression of the antiSemitic tragedy. I am putting myself in the skin of a person asking questions about a clever people." Mr Irving is suing Deborah Lipstadt, an American academic, and Penguin Books, over her book Denying the Holocaust: The Growing assault on Truth and Memory, in which she claims that he is a denier of the Holocaust.
Mr Rampton, for the defence, put the question: "Every time there is a pogrom or gassing or machinegunning into a pit it's entirely the Jews' fault because some of them are very good at playing the piano and making money?"
Mr Irving: "That's a childish over-simplification." Mr Irving, who is representing himself, said: "I am not a racist. I haven't seen a single coloured person on your team behind you." The historian, who said he employed people regardless of their race, was reprimanded by Mr Justice Grey when he twice repeated the accusation. The High Court was shown a video of Mr Irving addressing the National Alliance, a right-wing American organisation, in Tampa, Florida, in October 1995 in which he spoke of what he called the "legend of the Holocaust".
Mr Irving denied any association with the NA but it was put to him he had spoken at eight of their events between 1990 and 1998.
Asked why he had said in his Tampa speech that he found the Holocaust story "boring", Mr Irving said: "I think 95 per cent of the thinking public find the Holocaust boring by now but don't say it because it's politically incorrect. What other expression is there for the fact that it's all the Jews go on about now? There have been the most incredible episodes in Jewish history but all you hear of in films and so on of late is the Holocaust."
Asked to account for a suggestion
that a Holocaust survivor may have faked her Auschwitz tattoo,
Mr Irving said that Jewish people were not immune from criticism.
The hearing continues.
The historian David Irving was yesterday accused in the high court
holocaust libel trial of being a racist. Mr Irving, who is seeking
damages over claims that he is a "holocaust denier",
rejected the allegation.
The accusation was made during cross-examination of the 62-year-old author of Hitler's War by Richard Rampton QC, defending the American academic, Deborah Lipstadt and Penguin Books.
Mr Rampton, questioning Mr Irving on his various "utterances both in public and private on the subject of Jews, blacks etc", accused him of teaching his daughter aged nine months a "racist ditty" when he took her out for a walk.
The QC read out a September 1994 extract from Mr Irving's personal diaries in which the historian referred to a poem he had sung to his daughter when "half-breed children" were wheeled past:
Mr Rampton asked: "Racist, Mr Irving? Anti-Semitic, Mr Irving?"
Mr Irving, who is representing himself, replied: "I don't think so."
Mr Rampton: "Teaching your little child this kind of poison?" Mr Irving: "Do you think a nine-month-old can understand ..." Mr Rampton: "The poor little child is being taught a racist ditty by her perverted racist father."
Mr Irving replied firmly: "I am not a racist."
The author is suing Professor Lipstadt and Penguin Books over her 1994 book Denying the Holocaust The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory, which he says has generated hatred against him.
The defendants, who deny libel, have accused him of being a liar and a falisfier of history.
Mr Rampton also referred to a speech made by Mr Irving in September 1992. The author had said: "For the time being, for a transitional period I'd be prepared to accept that the BBC should have a dinner-jacketed gentleman reading the important news to us, followed by a lady reading all the less important news, followed by Trevor McDonald giving us all the latest news about the muggings and the drug busts ..."
Mr Rampton, who said the rest was lost in laughter and applause, asked Mr Irving: "Are you not appalled by that?" Mr Irving replied: "Not in the least." It was the same kind of speech, he said, which would be given by a stand-up comic at the end of Brighton pier.
The court was shown a video of Mr Irving addressing a meeting of the rightwing American organisation the National Alliance, in Tampa, Florida, in October, 1995, in which he talked of the "leg end" of the holocaust. Mr Rampton said that Mr Irving had spoken at eight National Alliance events between 1990 and 1998.
Mr Irving said that he had no association with the alliance, had no idea what it was and had not attended events which "to his knowledge" had been organised by it.
The hearing was adjourned until today.
Ce texte a été affiché sur Internet à des fins purement éducatives, pour encourager la recherche, sur une base non-commerciale et pour une utilisation mesurée par le Secrétariat international de l'Association des Anciens Amateurs de Récits de Guerre et d'Holocauste (AAARGH). L'adresse électronique du Secrétariat est <aaarghinternational@hotmail.com>. L'adresse postale est: PO Box 81475, Chicago, IL 60681-0475, USA.
Afficher un texte sur le Web équivaut à mettre un document sur le rayonnage d'une bibliothèque publique. Cela nous coûte un peu d'argent et de travail. Nous pensons que c'est le lecteur volontaire qui en profite et nous le supposons capable de penser par lui-même. Un lecteur qui va chercher un document sur le Web le fait toujours à ses risques et périls. Quant à l'auteur, il n'y a pas lieu de supposer qu'il partage la responsabilité des autres textes consultables sur ce site. En raison des lois qui instituent une censure spécifique dans certains pays (Allemagne, France, Israël, Suisse, Canada, et d'autres), nous ne demandons pas l'agrément des auteurs qui y vivent car ils ne sont pas libres de consentir.
Nous nous plaçons sous
la protection de l'article 19 de la Déclaration des Droits
de l'homme, qui stipule:
ARTICLE 19
<Tout individu a droit à la liberté d'opinion
et d'expression, ce qui implique le droit de ne pas être
inquiété pour ses opinions et celui de chercher,
de recevoir et de répandre, sans considération de
frontière, les informations et les idées par quelque
moyen d'expression que ce soit>
Déclaration internationale des droits de l'homme,
adoptée par l'Assemblée générale de
l'ONU à Paris, le 10 décembre 1948.