Without the lie of the alleged "Holocaust" and the alleged
"gas chambers", the State of Israel would not exist
and peace would be more prevalent. With that false "Holocaust",
which has become the sword and the shield of Israel, peace is
in danger. Thus it is that an imaginary holocaust, created and
maintained by both the Zionists of Israel and the Jews of the
Diaspora, may lead to a real, worldwide holocaust.
The Jews and the Americans
In 1947-1948, presenting themselves as the survivors of an alleged
genocide, the Jews obtained, by blackmail and terrorism, the right
to create a state in the land of Palestine. With aplomb, they
persuaded the international community that, as compensation for
an unprecedented tragedy (their supposed "Holocaust"),
it was fitting that they be awarded an unprecedented remedy: the
devolution of lands belonging to other populations. Then, having
received this exorbitant endowment, they extended their territory
considerably in chronic wars, paying no heed to the restrictions
set down by the United Nations Organisation for the benefit of
the Palestinians, provisions which the Zionists had made a commitment
to respect. Over a span of more than fifty years, with the aid
of the Jewish Diaspora, they have carried out a policy of colonial
conquest and apartheid to the detriment of the Palestinian people.
They have violated international agreements one after another,
considering null and void about sixty UN resolutions made against
their practices. The American political leaders have supported,
armed and defended their state, Israel, as devotedly as if it
were the first and foremost state of the United States of America.
It must be said that they cannot afford to defy their Jewish lobby,
which closely monitors and scrutinises all of the country,s political
and media spheres. It may also be noted that most Americans, intoxicated
by holocaust propaganda, are only too apt to find in the products
of Jewish neurosis their own basic view of a world made up of
two camps: one good (Jews and their associates), the other evil
(Nazis and the like). For them, all is gauged in reference to
the Nazi, the supreme villain, ever bent on killing the poor Jew,
paragon of innocence and goodness. It is no mere coincidence that
the ghastly hulk called "United States Holocaust Memorial
Museum" stands in the immediate proximity of the Washington
Monument, not far from Capitol Hill.
The Arabs and the Muslims
The Jews have ended up exhausting the patience of the Arab and
Muslim world. In their long history they had, over the centuries,
made themselves undesirable amongst all the peoples of Europe
who had admitted them in large numbers, particularly the English,
the French, the Spanish and, especially, the Germans and the Poles.
Until rather recently the example of the Arabs, long-standing
(relative) tolerance towards the Jews served as material for morality
lessons regularly dispensed to those peoples. Now such lessons
are no longer possible. There is no more Arab exception: even
their fellow Semites are now rising against the Jewish people,
"domineering and self-assured" (Charles de Gaulle in
1967). Within the Jewish community itself there have indeed been
efforts from time to time on the part of a few clear-sighted persons
like Noam Chomsky and the late Israel Shahak, author of Jewish
History, Jewish Religion, to make their warnings heard by the
zealots, but in vain. That said, Chomsky, like Shahak, has always
endorsed the great Jewish myth, thus effectively authorising Israel
to go on using, with the clearest conscience, its best argument
and the number one weapon in its arsenal: the "Holocaust",
precisely. The Arabs, the Muslims and the whole people of Palestine
are the main victims, today, of that weapon and that argument
fashioned from a lie.
The New Crusade
On 11 September 2001, particularly in New York, the weak struck
the citadel of the mighty. The heart of the Judeo-American power,
the very district of Wall Street, where the lot of the world's
lowly billions is decided daily, was hit by the full force of
"terrorists" brave enough to sacrifice their lives in
a suicide mission.
In New York, the first tower of the World Trade Centre (a name
carrying quite an agenda!) could have been called "Hamburg"
or "Hiroshima" and the second "Dresden" or
"Nagasaki". But their destruction seems to have left,
according to various estimates, no more than between three and
five thousand dead, which is a far cry from the great feats of
annihilation of the US Air Force and the Royal Air Force in the
early 1940s.
Nonetheless, America has thereupon embarked on yet another crusade.
Already in the early 1940s, general Dwight Eisenhower (who, in
reward, would be made president after the enterprise) had launched
a "Crusade in Europe", a military-industrial project
which was to prove extremely fruitful for the United States ("The
Best War Ever") but, for the peoples of Europe, quite the
reverse: for them it meant millions of dead, immense destruction
and the entrustment of a good part of their continent to the Russo-Soviet
Moloch. This "liberation" of Europe, moreover, was to
bring in its wake an atrocious political purge, the murderous
deportation of from twelve to fifteen million Germans, widespread
sordid aggression against civilians, the dismemberment of a great
country, its complete military occupation under a reign of censorship,
an Allied-imposed famine and the establishment of tribunals at
which the victors, acting both as judges and prosecutors, put
the vanquished on trial in patently sham proceedings. Still today,
in 2001, trials of that kind allow the children of Israel to exact
vengeance on octogenarians or nonagenarians accused, on the strength
of simple Jewish testimonies, of "crimes against humanity".
The previous crusades
In reaction to the attacks which it has sustained, America, this
time, is out to get "infinite justice" in what will
be its twentieth slaughter of civilians in sixty years. From 1941
to 2001, no military corps will have killed or burnt more civilians,
more children, more infants than the air armada made up by the
US Air Force and the squadrons of the US Army and Navy, at times
seconded by their ally, the RAF. The flying champions of phosphorus,
napalm, Agent Orange, fragmentation bombs, of the nuclear blaze
and of enriched or depleted uranium, are presently set to inflict
upon miserably poor lands their time-honoured lessons in international
law, justice, virtue and "enduring freedom" as they
have formerly done in Berlin, Hamburg, Dresden, and in Europe
at large (67,000 killed for the "liberation" of France
alone), and in Japan, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Nicaragua,
El Salvador, Grenada, Panama, Yugoslavia and elsewhere. In the
space of sixty years the Americans, who are, besides, the world,s
biggest industrial polluters, have stuffed the Earth's surface
with billions of bombs, shells, missiles and mines, particular
anti-personnel mines, which pose terrible danger for civilians.
Anxious " and it is understandable " to spare the lives
of their own soldiers, US "Defence" chiefs are inclined
to opt more often than not for a particularly cowardly style of
combat. Dropping bombs at high altitude, launching missiles from
great distance, spreading terror amongst unarmed civilian populations,
they have for some years been searching for the "zero-death
war", which, as French revisionist Vincent Reynouard
puts it, amounts to waging wars in which, on one side, the death
count is nought or close to it whilst, on the other, the dead
count for naught. Ensconced on their aircraft carriers or on bases
well removed from the front, the boys, chewing their bubble-gum
and absorbing peanuts and "soda-pop", comfortably wreak
death and destruction on distant peoples.
The real holocaust of the German cities
Compared with the martyrdom of the German cities during the last
war the fate of the Manhattan escapees just after the destruction
of the two towers was enviable. Those people left the scene of
the disaster without being strafed by machinegun fire. Unlike
the Germans of 1942-1945, starved, exhausted by lack of sleep,
each day stricken with grief by the news of the death of their
brothers and husbands, particularly on the Russian front, they
were not turned into living torches and shot at by fighter-bombers.
The victims of carpet bombing would flee with their clothing and
hair in flames. They would jump into a river. The fires died down
but as soon as the poor souls got out of the water they would
flare up anew. Phosphorus would have it so. The last survivors
died with the roof of their mouth blistered by the ambient heat.
As for the firemen and first-aid workers, many of them were killed
by delayed detonation bombs.
The futile lessons of the past
On that black Tuesday, the Americans were able to get an idea
" in truth, a scant idea " of what they have inflicted
on so many countries over so many years. In Vietnam they had experienced
a humiliating defeat that earned them 56,000 full bodybags. They
seemed to have found out what it might cost to despise those who
were smaller, weaker and poorer than themselves. France and Britain
had, for their part, gone through identical humiliations during
the collapse of their colonial empires and appeared, also, to
have learnt some useful lessons. But here we have the United States,
Britain and France all seized by a warlike frenzy, forgetting
the lessons of their most recent history.
Terrorism magnified by those who complain of it
It is a bit comical to see the mighty denouncing the terrorism
of their adversaries. Not only did these same mighty ones invent
large-scale terrorism but they even promoted, praised and sublimated
it under the term "Resistance". Roosevelt, Churchill,
de Gaulle, Tito and their friend Stalin all, in varying degrees,
drew up policies of murder, by snipers, of enemy soldiers and
civilians. They thus coldly provoked reprisals, carried out in
line with the provisions of international conventions, so that
slaughter should breed slaughter. In the 20th century they institutionalised
covert warfare, the war of cowards. Assuredly, the spirit of resistance
is a noble one but not in that form. And what is to be said of
the terrorism practised by the founders of the Zionist state,
who murdered, for example, Lord Moyne, Count Bernadotte and so
many others? A model, it seems, of struggle in a just cause.
The luck of the Jews
The two New York ("Jew York") office towers were held
under a long lease by one Larry Silverstein, who will doubtless
get large "compensation". His coreligionist Madeleine
Albright, daughter of a Jewish thief called Korber, had, in 1996,
stated that, if American policy towards Iraq had brought death
to 500,000 (?) Iraqi children, then "the price was worth
it". The Israeli Netanyahu, for his part, could not hide
his joy upon learning of the destruction of the towers and the
death of thousands of Americans: it was good news for the Jews,
as America would now understand that its own interests and those
of Israel were identical. As for Sharon, the butcher and bludgeon
man, he, along with Shimon Peres, saw in it an opportunity both
for his policy of planting Jewish settlements amidst the Arab
masses and for his programme of systematic assassinations. For
the time being, the United States still allows him to kill Palestinian
adults and children where and when he likes with bullets, shells,
missiles, tanks, helicopters and planes supplied by the American
taxpayer.
Bad times ahead for the Jews
The Americans and Israelis may carry on with this sport at their
leisure. But it could cost them dearly, for the State of Israel
is henceforth doomed. It will not even have lasted as long as
the ephemeral Christian kingdom of Jerusalem. There need be no
Ben Laden or new Saladin. Neither weapons, nor money, nor the
United States, nor the Jews of the Diaspora, nor Germany which,
in the grip of its national-masochism, would be capable of sacrificing
its soldiers for the survival of the Jewish leech state, will
halt "the Descent". (The Hebrews give that name to the
movement of their kind in the direction opposite to that of "the
Ascent" to the Promised Land.) The Israelis are already jumping
ship. In Tel Aviv, in Jerusalem and in their settlements, Jewish
fathers and mothers are in fear for their own lives and for their
children,s, for their professional future or their business. The
weight of taxes needed to cover the Israeli military budget and
the length and dangers of national service, for both men and women,
are making for a decrease, via the phenomenon of re-emigration,
in the numbers of taxpayers and potential soldiers. The Promised
Land is becoming the most hazardous spot in the world for the
Jews. It used to be a perfect safe haven for fraudsters and thieves,
particularly for the mafia called "Russian" and which
is in fact Judeo-Russian. Only extremely rarely have requests
for extradition ever been granted to countries trying to prosecute
Flatto Sharon and his ilk. But today, the Paris courts have begun
noticing that, in the case of the gigantic bank swindle known
as the affaire du Sentier, the crooks who had fled the country
to find refuge in Israel prefer to return, even if that means
ending up in prison. The land of milk and honey is awash in blood
and tears. Who is to blame?
The suitcase or the coffin
Thus the wandering Jew is about to take to the road once more.
In nearly every place where he has stayed, his behaviour has brought
on a revolt of the natives, who eventually have told him to choose
between the suitcase and the coffin. In Palestine, he will soon
have to pack his suitcase. He will make his way back to the rich
lands polluted by his holocaustic propaganda. It will be enough
for him to bewail a second "Holocaust" and a third Destruction
of the Temple. He will demand new reparations and privileges.
The "Shoah Business" and "Holocaust Industry"
will pick up with renewed vigour but, this time, with a risk of
reaching saturation point.
In a worst-case scenario, Israel may experience a civil war waged
by a breakaway army of desperados. In the end, Tel Aviv could
suffer the fate of Algiers in 1962 and Jewish Jerusalem that of
Saigon in 1975. But a less dramatic end like, for example, that
of communist East Germany or the Soviet empire, seems possible
as well. In any case, the epicentre of the present conflict is
Israel, and Israel is finished.
Various war propaganda
The lot of Palestinians of all faiths will be tragic, and this
will provoke more and more despair and fanaticism. The masses
of the Arab-Muslim countries already wish to see the West punished
for crimes which, in their view, the latter has committed or allowed
to be committed in Palestine (more so than in Saudi Arabia, Iraq
or Afghanistan). By way of reaction, a spirit of crusade or holy
war is also developing amongst them. Ayathoras and ayatollahs
are inciting one another. On either side, both amidst the rich
and mighty of the West and the deprived populations of the Arab-Muslim
world, passions and fears are intensifying. There is going to
be much killing and much telling of lies. The prodigious lie of
the alleged "Holocaust" of the Jews, sword and shield
of Israel and the Diaspora, may thus lead to a very real holocaust
of global dimensions. The revisionist authors had for quite some
time been warning that the religion of the false "Holocaust"
with its imaginary "gas chambers" and its alleged "Six
million" bore within it a frightful catalyst for hatred.
Current events may rightly cause one to fear lest this hatred
end up setting the world ablaze and thus provoke a worldwide holocaust.
The revisionists' caution
The revisionists will follow the example set by Paul Rassinier,
founder of their school. Not to be swayed by any war propaganda,
they will aim for exactitude whilst emotions, on either side,
breed lies. They will avoid promoting the inventions of anti-American,
anti-Jewish or anti-Arab propaganda and, with regard to September
11th, they must spare us the gossip, customary in such circumstances,
of the type "Bush knew", "The CIA couldn't have
been unaware", "The FBI is in on it", "The
Mossad fomented it all", "Four thousand Jews, who should
have been at work there that day, didn't show up", "Explosive
charges had been hidden in the two buildings", etc. Arab
propaganda, more than ever, will orchestrate the myths of the
Jew draining the blood from children or poisoning wells and will
invoke the obvious fake comprised by The Protocols of the Elders
of Zion. A batch of other rumours, deliria, psychoses and
phenomena of collective belief must be expected. The Americans
will underestimate the numbers of victims of their bombardments
and the Afghans will exaggerate them. The services of God or Jehovah,
on one side, and of Allah on the other will, along with those
of their prophets, be called on to stir up hatred and fear. Their
will be a proliferation of false witnesses, false reportages,
false interviews, false documents. In this field perhaps Bush
the son will surpass Bush the father and his story of the incubators
unplugged by the Iraqis in Kuwait. Censorship, of course, will
grow heavier without the various governments, even having to pass
new laws in that area.
The holy alliance of the mighty
In France, from the very outset, the daily Le Monde, which
I am in the habit of calling the journal oblique, made
its genuflexion. Under the by-line of its director, the hunched
over, sweaty-palmed Jean-Marie Colombani, it led with "We
are all Americans". In an instant, France found itself in
a state of war. It is a tradition dear to the left (which, as
everyone knows, has a monopoly of warm-heartedness and intelligence)
to plunge the country into war without prior consultation of Parliament,
nor any decision on the latter,s part. This amounts to a total
disregard for the law, for the constitution, but who cares? It
allows the French citizen to go to sleep at peace and to wake
up at war. To be fair, let us remember that the president, Mr
Jacques Chirac, a one-time Communist turned Gaullist, feels still
more warlike and American than his prime minister, Mr Lionel Jospin,
head of a Socialist-Communist-Green coalition. A kind of holy
alliance has been forged against the bald-headed, unkempt enemy
from whom all the harm came: Oussama Ben Laden (one must call
him by his name). Formerly, he was called Adolf Hitler. Had not
this latter committed an inexpiable crime by getting in the way
of gold, of the Jews and of Communism? He had had the effrontery
to refuse the gold standard. He had got on so well without it
that his new economic system was allowing him to trade on a large
scale with other countries poor in gold, notably Italy, Japan
and some central European and Latin American states. Panic had
struck Britain, France and the United States: Germany was encroaching
on their turf and taking away their markets. The rich (in gold)
never appreciate the revolt, the coalition and the success of
the poor (in gold). In the late 1930s, the three rich ones, who
claimed to be linked by one democratic system, were above all
bound to one other by a chain of gold. After the war, in 1947,
L. Genet and Victor-L. Tapié were able to publish, in their
Précis d'histoire contemporaine, 1919-1939 (Paris,
Hatier), a quotation which in English would read: "It is
thus not an ideological link but a chain of gold that binds the
great democracies to one another" (p. 206); they added: "Six
years of self-sufficiency made Germany the world's greatest industrial
country" (p. 209). Still more than others, the Jewish financiers
had taken offence: how could anyone get on in the world without
them and their gold?! As for communist Russia, it saw Hitler achieve
concretely the general social programme of its own aspiration.
The intrepid dictator was to pay a high price for his daring,
all the more as he tried to push his luck in other spheres. There
then came about the catastrophe, for Europe and Asia, of the Second
World War.
Currently, the new holy alliance of the western democracies and
Russia against the new rabble-rouser bodes ill for the future.
Beneath the customary veneer of generosity and disinterest, the
United States is going to be ferocious towards the Arab-Muslim
masses who might imperil Uncle Sam's supplies of natural resources,
his "World Trade" and his economy. Invoking their cherished
"Holocaust" and the need to avoid a second "Holocaust",
the Jews will be no less ferocious towards the Palestinians. The
Russians will crush any vague desires of independence amongst
their Muslim minorities, after which task they will, more than
ever, hold out the begging bowl to the Americans.
The only chance for peace
The only chance for peace lies in the spirit of resistance to
the falsehoods of the various propaganda. But, at the moment,
the most dangerous propaganda is not that of the poor. It is that
of the rich and mighty and their hirelings, all of whom are capable,
if they feel truly threatened, of setting the whole world alight.
It is that of the neurotics and their false "Holocaust".
It is that of the Jews, the Americans and those beholden to them.
Had the revisionists been heeded, the religion of the false "Holocaust"
of the Jews would have no legitimacy today. It would not still
be feeding the sympathy of a great part of the Western world for
the Zionist enterprise. The Diaspora would display less arrogance.
To begin with, the State of Israel would not exist.
Historical lies breed hatred, a "crusader" spirit and
war. A return to historical exactitude would favour reflection
and peace.
8 October 2001 (with corrections of 6 November)
This text has been displayed on the Net, and forwarded to you
as a tool for educational purpose, further research, on a non
commercial and fair use basis, by the International Secretariat
of the Association des Anciens Amateurs de Recits de Guerres et
d'Holocaustes (AAARGH). The E-mail of the Secretariat is <aaarghinternational
at hotmail.com. Mail can be sent at PO Box 81475, Chicago,
IL 60681-0475, USA..
We see the act of displaying a written document on Internet as
the equivalent to displaying it on the shelves of a public library.
It costs us a modicum of labor and money. The only benefit accrues
to the reader who, we surmise, thinks by himself. A reader looks
for a document on the Web at his or her own risks. As for the
author, there is no reason to suppose that he or she shares any
responsibilty for other writings displayed on this Site. Because
laws enforcing a specific censorship on some historical question
apply in various countries (Germany, France, Israel, Switzerland,
Canada, and others) we do not ask their permission from authors
living in thoses places: they wouldn't have the freedom to consent.
We believe we are protected by the Human Rights Charter:
ARTICLE 19. <Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.>The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948, in Paris.
You downloaded this document from <http://aaargh.com.mx/engl/FaurisArch/RF011008.html>